The Central Scrutinizers

Released on this day in ’79 Zappa’s target was, according to some sources, motivated by the banning of music in revolutionary Iran. The target we do know Zappa had in mind was the ascendancy of the fundamentalist Right of the ’80s and the idiotic PMRC proposal . . . but now the target is more appropriately applicable to the regressive Left. They are clearly on the back foot if one observes their lack of skepticism and critical thinking, pat virtue-signaling, pettiness, arrogance, literalism, lazy meaningless name-calling — revealing themselves to be humourless veriphobic authoritarians — despite their ostensible sophistication. Whichever butt-wipe becomes POTUS I think that our modern day Shakespearean fools such Lenny Bruce, Zappa, George Carlin, Peter Cook, Christopher Hitchens, and others would have been thoroughly entertained by what’s going down. Though these people are no longer with us, we now do have a loose coalition of luminaries such as Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Susan Haack, Douglas Murray, Glenn Lowry, John McWhorter, Richard Dawkins, Gad Saad, Maajid Nawaz, Hazem Farraj, Christina Sommers, Jonathan Haidt, Peter Boghossian and a raft of other fearless and clear thinking evidence-based LIBERALS pushing back. Whatever else I disagree with them on and what they lack in numbers, they more than adequately make up for with insight, ability and most importantly intellectual honesty: check out the bloody nose the regressives received earlier this year. One could sense that they thought the outcome of the debate was a shoo-in — so the victory was ever so sweet. One can tell that the regressives are circling the wagons with “journalism”, for the most part, being complicitous in their disingenuousness and their collective self-inflicted downfall.

Eventually it was discovered, that God did not want us to be all the same. This was Bad News for the Governments of The World, as it seemed contrary to the doctrine of Portion Controlled Servings. Mankind must be made more uniformly if The Future was going to work. Various ways were sought to bind us all together, but, alas, same-ness was unenforceable. It was about this time, that someone came up with the idea of Total Criminalization. Based on the principle, that if we were all crooks, we could at last be uniform to some degree in the eyes of The Law. […] Total Criminalization was the greatest idea of its time and was vastly popular except with those people, who didn’t want to be crooks or outlaws, so, of course, they had to be Tricked Into It… which is one of the reasons, why music was eventually made Illegal.

            – Joe’s Garage Acts II & III liner notes

b519255ee247d62e5df734154d94b5ba-1000x1000x1

Robert Musil and Nietzsche

The article examines several references to Friedrich Nietzsche made by Robert Musil in his non-fictional writings. An indication of Nietzsche’s significance for Musil is given by the fact that only one name occurs more often than Nietzsche’s in the collected works of Musil, where references to the philosopher span a period of more than forty years and the full name if often abbreviated, a habit which suggests familiarity. Musil attended two military academies, and the largely negative experiences he had there were to provide the stuff for the author’s first book. The schooling left Musil at the age of seventeen with a painful awareness of the inadequacies of his education in the humanities. In the few later sources in which he speaks of the great influences on his intellectual development in this early period, Nietzsche’s name is mentioned without fail. In an essay from 1926, he generalizes from his own experiences, listing Nietzsche among the new influences on writers of his era, who began writing around the turn of the century. Meanwhile, in May 1902, he records in his diary that he has borrowed two volumes of Nietzsche’s works and wonders how they will affect him this time. Musil admired Nietzsche’s literary genius and talent of expression and frequently quoted from his works. — Modern Language Review; Oct 1991, Vol. 86 Issue 4, p. 911

Walker Percy Wednesday 101

percycovercroppea

THE PLACE WHERE the strange events related in this book occur, Feliciana, is not imaginary. It was so named by the Spanish. It was and is part of Louisiana, a strip of pleasant pineland running from the Mississippi River to the Perdido, a curious region of a curious state. Never quite Creole or French or Anglo-Saxon or Catholic or Baptist like other parishes of Louisiana, it has served over the years as a refuge for all manner of malcontents. If America was settled by dissenters from various European propositions, Feliciana was settled by dissenters from the dissent, American Tories who had no use for the Revolution, disgruntled Huguenots and Cavaliers from the Carolinas, New Englanders fleeing from Puritanism, unionists who voted against secession, Confederate refugees from occupied New Orleans, deserters from the Confederate Army, smugglers from both sides, criminals holed up in the Honey Island Swamp.
Welcomed in the beginning by the hospitable and indolent Spanish of a decrepit empire, some of these assorted malcontents united long enough to throw out the Spanish and form an independent republic, complete with its own Declaration of Independence, flag, army, navy, constitution, and capital in St. Francisville. The new republic had no inclination to join French Louisiana to the south or the United States to the north and would as soon have been let alone. It lasted seventy-four days. Jefferson had bought Louisiana and that was that.
As pleasant a place as its name implies, it still harbors all manner of fractious folk, including Texans and recent refugees from unlikely places like Korea and Michigan, all of whom have learned to get along tolerably well, better than most in fact, who watch L.S.U. football and reruns of M*A*S*H, drink Dixie beer, and eat every sort of food imaginable, which is generally cooked in some thing called a roux.
The downside of Feliciana is that its pine forests have been mostly cut down, its bayous befouled, Lake Pontchartrain polluted, the Mississippi River turned into a sewer. It has too many malls, banks, hospitals, chiropractors, politicians, lawyers, realtors, and condos with names like Château Charmant.
Still and all, I wouldn’t live anywhere else.
It is strange, but these Louisianians, for all their differences and contrariness, have an affection for one another. It is expressed by small signs and courtesies, even between strangers, as if they shared a secret.
In what follows, the geography of the place has been somewhat scrambled. All of the people in Feliciana have been made up. The only real persons are the German and Austrian professors and physicians who were active in both the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich—Drs. de Crinis, Villinger, Schneider, Nitsche, Heyde—and the Swiss psychiatrist Dr. C. G. Jung. For this information about the Nazi doctors and their academic precursors in the Weimar Republic, I am indebted to Dr. Frederic Wertham’s remarkable book, A Sign for Cain.

71xts9yjggl

Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy

My chum and collaborator Roger Frantz is the founding editor of this new open access journal. So stay tuned for the first issue.

how-to-create-better-research-solutions-with-behavioral-data-640x360

Remembering Ken Minogue

Born on this day — see the themed issue of Cosmos + Taxis dedicated to Ken. Here is Ken at his elegant and wry best in Morals & the servile mind. I think Ken would have been chuffed by BREXIT not necessarily because of which side actually won, but because of which side was the most arrogant. Clue . . .

We must face up to the grim fact that the rulers we elect are losing patience with us.

The Engelsbergs Seminar 2011

Turing learning

I’ve been thinking about Turing’s lesser-known but still very important other contribution (i.e. to mathematical biology) — so while in Turing groove, I was pleased to come across this open access paper from the latest issue of Swarm Intelligence. So glad to report that Swarm Intelligence has seen through its first decade.

11721_2016_126_fig17_html

Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning

Much of Noam Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics—including its account of the way we learn languages—is being overturned. Paul Ibbotson and Michael Tomasello in Scientific American

5bef808d-f857-4f51-b88a-b896c6b23724-620x372

The Sensory Order and Other Writings on the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology

I’m very much looking forward to the reissue of TSO conveniently bundled along with other important MSS heretofore only available as Hoover photocopies. Kudos to Viktor Vanberg for pulling this together and of course to Bruce Caldwell, the series’ general editor.

9780226436425

Walker Percy Wednesday 100

percycovercroppea

Thirty years earlier the child knew that something was going to happen, and that the something was all he ever wanted or needed to know, and that it only remained for him to wait for it to happen and to settle for nothing less until it did.
What was the something? Women? War? Or victory in life? Death?
Thirty years passed. He had women, war, and victory in life.
But nothing changed. Thirty years later he knew no more than he knew in Dalhart, Texas, squeezing his legs together and looking at girls.
Yes, but you have just discovered again what you knew all along, that something is going to happen.

*****

But is it not also a surprise that discovering you’ve been dead all these years, you should now feel somewhat alive?
He killed me then and I did not know it. I even thought he had missed me. I have been living, yes, but it is a living death because I knew he wanted me dead.

Am I entitled to live? I am alive by a fluke like the sole survivor of Treblinka, who lived by a fluke, but did not really feel entitled to live.
Ah, but there is a difference between feeling dead and not knowing it, and feeling dead and knowing it. Knowing it means there is a possibility of feeling alive though dead.

*****

Again the past rose to haunt him and the future rose to beckon to him. Things took on significance.

*****

“Tell me the single truth, not two or more separate truths, unless separate truths are subtruths of the single truth. Is there one truth or several separate truths?”

*****

In any event, the historical phenomenon of the Jews cannot be accounted for by historical or sociological theory.

71x7p-XhQGL