Archive | June, 2009

Complexity 101

Here are some nice distinctions drawn about complexity theory by someone coming to the subject with a fresh and curious mind.

Comments Off

The A.I. Report

Forbes features a symposium on A.I: it’s past, present and future.

The editor writes:

Can machines think? In 1950, Alan Turing, considered by some to be the father of modern computing, published a paper in which he proposed that, “If, during text-based conversation, a machine is indistinguishable from a human, then it could be said to be ‘thinking’ and, therefore, could be attributed with intelligence.” He predicted that a computer would pass this “Turing Test” by the end of the century. That hasn’t happened–yet. But the question continues to provoke and inspire. AI might be just around the corner, or it might be centuries away.

To this I might add, maybe never.

 

0622_artificial-intelligence_170x170

Comments Off

EPISTEME ’09

A quick reminder about the upcoming EPISTEME conference.

Comments Off

Being Heidegger

Simon Critchley has the first of an eight-part series of blog postings on Heidegger’s Being and Time. Will he discuss the influence Heidegger has had on non-Cartesian cognitive science? We will see. Unlikely as it sounds, Gilbert Ryle’s critical notice (Mind XXXVIII 1929, 355-370) warmly welcomed Sein und Zeit despite the inherent difficulties of the work (usually misappropriated or vulgarized in contexts where there is no philosophical culture): 

Ryle on Heidegger

As Critchley puts it: “Reading Being and Time can sometimes feel like wading through a conceptual mud of baroque and unfamiliar concepts.” Check out the BBC documentary on Heidegger.

heidegger2

Comments Off

Hayek in Mind: Hayek’s Philosophical Psychology

Call for papers

Hayek in Mind: Hayek’s Philosophical Psychology

Leslie Marsh, Volume Editor

Advances in Austrian Economics

Hayek’s philosophical psychology as set out in his The Sensory Order (1952) has, for the most part, been a neglected work. Social theory, Hayek’s traditional disciplinary constituency, has recently begun to take note and examine its place in the complete Hayek corpus. Despite being lauded by computer scientist grandee Frank Rosenblatt and more recently by neuroscientists Gerald Edelman and Joaquin Fuster, cognitive science (with few exceptions) has yet to discover Hayek’s philosophical psychology. This volume seeks to redress this lacuna by soliciting critical assessments on some aspect(s) of Hayek’s philosophical psychology. Proposals that offer a suggestive deployment of Hayek’s philosophical psychology are also welcome. What makes this volume distinctive is that the editors are seeking submissions that examine Hayek from the perspective of recent philosophy of mind.

Suggested topics include (but is not exhaustive):

Mind-body problem; connectionism; externalism; intentionality; knowing how-knowing that; the frame problem; enactivism; Hayek’s non-Cartesianism; cognitive closure; qualia; the hard vs. the easy problems; Hayek’s Kantianism; functionalism; individuation of mental states; cognitive science as a multi-disciplinary enterprise.

Accepted articles will form chapters in the hardcover book series Advances in Austrian Economics. All articles are subject to double blind review: further details about this series can be found on the publisher’s webpage.

Proposals not exceeding 500 words should be sent to Leslie Marsh by December 15, 2009.

Comments Off

The Bounds of Cognition

Once again I want to bring your attention to the superb Critical Notice by Justin Fisher in the latest issue of The Journal of Mind and Behavior on Adams’ and Aizawa’s The Bounds of Cognition.

9781405149143

Comments Off

Oakeshott on Religion, Science and Politics

The recent Zygon symposium on Oakeshott on religion, science and politics is now available as a free download. Click here and scroll down to the REFLECTING ON MICHAEL OAKESHOTT section.

Comments Off
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers