Category Archive Browsing Category: experience and its modes

Browse by:
a companion to michael oakeshott, aesthetics, british idealism, corey abel, david boucher, elizabeth corey, epistemology, experience and its modes, geoffrey thomas, idealism, kenneth mcintyre, kenneth minogue, liberal education, liberalism, martyn thompson, metaphysics, Noël Malcolm, Noël O’Sullivan, oakeshott, on human conduct, Paul franco, penn state, philosophical jurisprudence, philosophy of education, philosophy of history, philosophy of mind, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, political philosophy, rationalism in politics, Robert Devigne, robert grant, Steven Gerencser, timothy fuller

A Companion to Michael Oakeshott (Again)

We know it’s been a long time in coming but we have some blindingly superb essays comprising this volume. In lieu of conventional abstracts here is an extract from Paul and my introductory essay. For a full table of contents and a dedicated website see here. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Editorial Extract The first two essays deal with…

experience and its modes, oakeshott, philosophy

Experience and Its Modes

I chanced upon this  online version of arguably my favourite philosophical book. The opening paragraph should be something every student should read and have posted above ones desk:  An interest in philosophy is often first aroused by an irrelevant impulse to see the world and ourselves better than we find them. We seek in philosophy…

bradley, collingwood, epistemology, experience and its modes, hegel, idealism, metaphysics, oakeshott, philosophy, philosophy of history, philosophy of mind, qualia, sellars, sensation

Old Reviews of Experience and its Modes

Here are two reviews of Experience and its Modes that I’ve only recently come across. The former is exceedingly warm; the latter, not surprisingly, very dismissive since it is reviewed in North America’s premier philosophy journal. I don’t mean to imply that The Journal of Philosophy is unduly critical – merely, that philosophy journals are,…

british idealism, byron kaldis, category error, corey abel, creationist science, elizabeth corey, experience and its modes, hermeneutics, idealism, ignoratio elenchi, intelligent design, leslie marsh, liberalism, michael oakeshott, modality, oakeshott, podoksik, political philosophy, politics, science, science wars, sociology, stephen jay gould, timothy fuller, wittgenstein

Oakeshott on Religion, Science and Politics

The recent Zygon symposium on Oakeshott on religion, science and politics is now available as a free download. Click here and scroll down to the REFLECTING ON MICHAEL OAKESHOTT section.

british idealism, byron kaldis, category error, corey abel, creationist science, elizabeth corey, experience and its modes, ignoratio elenchi, intelligent design, modality, non-overlapping magisteria, oakeshott, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, podoksik, political philosophy, politics, relativism, religion, science, social constructivism, stephen jay gould, timothy fuller, Zygon

Oakeshott on Religion, Science and Politics

Here is my introduction to the Zygon symposium on Oakeshott to appear in the March 2009 issue. This is an uncorrected proof – do not cite.

aesthetics, atheism, byron kaldis, civil conversation, conservatism, corey abel, elizabeth corey, ethics, evolution, experience and its modes, Georg Simmel, George Santayana, intelligent design, modes, philosophy of history, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, podoksik, political philosophy, politics, religion, science, science wars, stephen jay gould, timothy fuller, Zygon

Oakeshott on Religion, Science and Politics

Here are the abstracts for the forthcoming Zygon: A Journal of Religion and Science symposium on Oakeshott. Elizabeth Corey (Baylor) RELIGION AND THE MODE OF PRACTICE IN MICHAEL OAKESHOTT Michael Oakeshott’s religious view of the world stands behind much of his political and philosophical writing. The present essay proceeds first by discussing Oakeshott’s view of religion…