Oakeshott Conference: Tulsa 2011

liberal education, liberalism, oakeshott, philosophy of education, political philosophy, politics, religion

Religion, Politics and the Future of Liberal Education:
The Tenth Anniversary Meeting of the
Michael Oakeshott Association, 2001-2011

UNIVERSITY OF TULSA
OCTOBER 13-16, 2011

2011 marks the tenth anniversary of the founding of the Michael Oakeshott Association, a group established to encourage the critical study of one of the twentieth century’s most important political philosophers. Previous conferences have taken place at the London School of Economics, Colorado College, the University of Jena in Germany, and Baylor University.

The University of Tulsa will host the Association’s meetings this year. The focus of the conference will be Oakeshott’s understanding of liberal education and the contemporary university. Also central will be the possible relationships between university education, politics and religion. Potential authors should strive both to engage Oakeshott’s work on its own terms and to locate it in broader discussions about education, religion and politics. Papers that compare Oakeshott to other relevant thinkers are encouraged.

Abstracts, no more than 500 words, should be sent by April 15, 2011 to Elizabeth_Corey@baylor.edu. Abstracts should also include: title of paper, full name(s), affiliation, current position, and an email address.

Tallis Reviews Ramachandran’s Latest

brain, brain science, churchland, cognition, cognitive closure, cognitive science, consciousness, Daniel Dennett, mirror neurons, neuromania, neuron, neurophilosophy, neuroscience, phantom limbs, philosophy of mind, Ramachandran, raymond tallis, synesthesia

Via Pete Mandik at Brain Hammer here is a rather snippy review by Raymond Tallis in the WSJ on V. S. Ramachandran’s latest which just yesterday I was leafing through. Is this the opening salvo of a slanging match akin to the APA Eastern Division meeting a few years back with Dennett vs. Bennett and Hacker?

The trouble begins when the neurologist turns philosopher and tries to use these insights to get closer to “what makes us human.” He suggests that such cross-wiring underpins both humans’ ability to enjoy metaphors and artists’ capacity to create novel connections—an assertion that has scarcely any research to back it up. (What little has been done depends on laughably simplistic models of how metaphors and creativity really work.) Likewise, his explanation of how we became speaking animals has scarcely a toe-hold on empirical data.

Social Epistemology in Good Health

adrian haddock, alvin goldman, duncan prichard, episteme, epistemology, Ernest Sosa, Frederick F. Schmitt, jennifer lackey, Jonathan Kvanvig, Lorraine Code, Michael Lynch, miranda fricker, paul faulkner, ram neta, sandy goldberg, social epistemology

Here is a new title from OUP comprising new essays on social epistemology. Some of the best names in the business are here. This is a nice compliment to the New Studies and  Essential Readings volumes that came out earlier in 2010.

Less Than Human

anthropology, cognitive science, david livingstone smith, evolutionary biology, evolutionary psychology, homophobia, less than human, military propaganda, racism, xenophobia

I want to give a plug to the soon to be released book by my chum David Livingstone Smith. DLS has that wonderful ability to make serious reading very accessible while never dumbing down the subject matter. Here is a just released UNE article on DLS. See here for the book’s Amazon page listing endorsements from some of the biggest names in the field.

 

Related Articles

Philippa Foot

Aquinas, Elizabeth Anscombe, iris murdoch, is/ought, moral philosophy, Philippa Foot, steve pyke

Article in the NYT via David Livingstone Smith. Nice photo by Steve Pyke as one would expect.

Foot’s legacy: I think she did make a relevant claim, when it needed to be discussed (i.e. when Hare’s prescriptivism, for good or ill, seemed to impose no restriction of content on moral judgement), that morality is internally related to considerations of benefit and harm and that not just anything can count as such. Her weakness was, I think, that she delivered aperçus but didn’t elaborate them – we just got articles and (then only latterly) very slender books. The books were passés, really. Ethics had moved on from the debates of the 50s from which she never genuinely emerged.

Some Mind Titles for 2011

Carlo Umilta, cognitive science, consciousness, Dennett, embodied cognition, embodiment, emotion, enaction, enactivism, eric schwitzbebel, evolutionary psychology, ezequiel di paolo, Frances Anderson, inside jokes, john stewart, louise barrett, matthew hurley, michelle maiese, neuromania, olivier gapenne, Paolo Legrenzi, philosophy of mind, reginald adams, things and places, zenon pylyshyn

Some books to look out for in 2011:

Also Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (shame about the cringe-making subtitle that has all the hyperbolic clichés “toward,” “new” and that old favourite “paradigm.”)

Neuromania: On the limits of brain science


Amygdala volume and social network size in humans

Amygdala, Bradford Dickerson, brain, brain scans, brain science, Christopher Wright, cognition, cognitive science, complex adaptive systems, Kevin Bickart, Lisa Feldman Barrett, network theory, networks, neurobiology, neuron, neurophilosophy, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, philosophy of social science, psychology, Rebecca Dautoff, situated cognition, social cognition, social networking, sociocognition

Not a deep surprise but still nice to see some empirical work coming through. Check out this brief report just published online in Nature Neuroscience. The upshot: participants with larger amygdalas typically had more people in their social lives and maintained more complex relationships.

Philosophy of history

daniel little, philosophy, philosophy of history, philosophy of social science, philosophy on the radio, philosophy talks

The old firm of Taylor and Perry interview Dan Little for Philosophy Talk

Is history just a series of events, or an interpretation of those events? Is there progress in history? Can history be objective, or is it, as Napoleon said, just the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon? Ken and John revisit the past and it’s meaning with Daniel Little, Chancellor of the University of Michigan-Dearborn and author of New Contributions to the Philosophy of History. (First broadcast 1/11/2009)

Noë: Does Thinking Happen In The Brain?

active externalism, active perception, Alva Noë, Andy Clark, Boundaries of the Mind, Bounds of Cognition, brain, brain reading, brain science, cognition, cognition in the wild, cognitive science, consciousness, cybernetics, cyborgs, Descartes, Embedded, embodied cognition, embodiment, enactivism, extended mind, externalism, John Dylan Haynes, neural correlates, neurophilosophy, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, philosophy of psychology, philosophy of science

Speaking of Andy Clark and Alva Noë in the previous posting, here is Noë writing for NPR set to continue in another installment.