There is an excellent collection of papers comprising the latest issue of Topoi (Volume 28, Number 1 / March, 2009). I assume that because of the introduction “Mind Embodied, Embedded, Enacted: One Church or Many?” this issue was pulled together by Julian Kiverstein and Andy Clark. They set up the issue by posing the following two questions, questions that I’ve been wrestling with of late given the issue I’m currently pulling together:
[w]hat, if anything, forms the deep theoretical core of the embodied, embedded approach? Equally importantly, we may ask to what extent the various projects pursued under the single umbrella are in fact harmonious?
This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 28th, 2009 at 11:23 pm and is filed under Adams & Aizawa, Alva Noë, Alzheimer's, Andy Clark, Bounds of Cognition, Daniel Dennett, Embedded, Enacted, Julian Kiverstein, Supersizing the Mind, active perception, autonomy, brain, cognition, cognitive science, collective intentionality, consciousness, cyborgs, distributed cognition, distributed knowledge, embodiment, extended mind, functionalism, mark rowlands, mind body, neurobiology, neurophilosophy, philosophy of mind, philosophy of social science, robert wilson, situated cognition, social cognition, sociocognition, susan hurley. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
