Anthony Grayling has convened a “symposium” on Reason in the latest issue of the New Scientist. Grayling’s position is very predictable but credit to him and the editors for bringing together a diverse group who for the most part seem to disagree with his conception. Neuroscientist Chris Frith, mathematician Roger Penrose and philosopher Mary Midgley are the highlights (at least for me) – Chomsky gives his usual pat responses. There is a series of short videos to accompany the symposium.
Reason with a capital “R”
July 26, 2008 Comments Off Short URL atheism, chomsky, chris frith, civil conversation, cognition, enlightenment, epistemology, grayling, mary midgley, philosophy of social science, political philosophy, psychology, rationality, reason, relativism, roger penrose, romanticism, social cognition, social epistemology, sociology
-
Steps to a “Properly Embodied” Cognitive Science
May 27, 2012
-
Intersubjectivity and Objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl
May 26, 2012
-
Epistemological Problems of Privacy and Secrecy
May 25, 2012
-
Science, the Market and Iterative Knowledge
May 24, 2012
-
The Goldilocks problem and extended cognition
May 23, 2012
-
Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind
May 22, 2012
-
Brain (call) box
May 22, 2012
-
A liberal arts education
May 22, 2012
-
In Praise of Reason
May 21, 2012
-
The Zombie Within
May 20, 2012
Archives
- Steps to a “Properly Embodied” Cognitive Science wp.me/p4saY-1TY 8 hours ago
- Intersubjectivity and Objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl A Collection of Essays wp.me/p4saY-1TP 1 day ago
- Epistemological Problems of Privacy and Secrecy wp.me/p4saY-1TJ 2 days ago
- Science, the Market and Iterative Knowledge wp.me/p4saY-1Qy 3 days ago
- The Goldilocks problem and extended cognition wp.me/p4saY-1Td 4 days ago